Grondwet

PENDELEGASIAN KEWENANGAN PENDAFTARAN, PEMERIKSAAN BUKTI-BUKTI DAN MENDENGAR KETERANGAN AHLI PERKARA HAK UJI MATERIL SECARA TERBUKA PADA PTUN ATAU PT TUN

Dani Sintara — Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0700

The issue of judicial review authority conducted in the State Administrative Court in conducting testing of provincial regulations and district/city regulations is different, but testing in the State Administrative Court has not been openly implemented. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study showed that the Judicial Review of the District / City Regional Regulation was delegated to the State Administrative Court. Judicial Review of Provincial Regional Regulations is delegated to the High Court of State Administration so that it must be carried out openly, presenting the parties, examination of evidence, witnesses, and experts and the pronouncement of verdicts that are open to the public

PROBLEMATIKA PENGUJIAN FORMIL UNDANG-UNDANG

Ali Marwan — Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0700

Mahkamah Konstitusi mempunyai legitimasi untuk melaksanakan pengujian formil undang-undang melalui ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan yurisprudensi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Namun, dalam penerapannya pengujian formil tidak dilaksanakan sebagaimana mestinya. Khususnya dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009, di mana Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak menyatakan undang-undang yang jelas-jelas dibentuk tidak sesuai prosedur tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan menggunakan asas manfaat. Seharusnya, apabila suatu undang-undang jelas-jelas dibentuk tidak sesuai prosedur harus dinyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat secara keseluruhan tanpa melihat apakah materinya memberikan manfaat atau tidak.

PENERAPAN KUOTA PEKERJA BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS PADA BUMN DAN BUMD DI DKI JAKARTA

Fajri Hidayatullah — Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0700

Policies and regulations related to legal protection for persons with disabilities in Indonesia are adequate, but overall they have not been implemented optimally. The results of the research at FHCI as a partner invited by BUMN and BUMD, have not employed persons with disabilities in accordance with existing regulatory provisions and have not carried out their obligations by providing fulfillment of the rights of disabled workers as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The purpose of this study is to knowing and analisys for implementation regarding the policy of recruiting disabled workers in BUMN and BUMD, while the research method used is descriptive qualitative, which is a data analysis method that is carried out by processing and analyzing systematically, the results of the study show that the implementor has not implemented the regulatory provisions. that already exists, so that the reality that occurs in the recruitment of disabled workers has not run optimally, in terms of recruitment and placement, as well as not fulfilling the quota that has been determined for disability in BUMN and BUMD. FHCI, BUMN and BUMD have not fulfilled the rights of persons with disabilities in terms of providing job opportunities, providing skills training and getting decent jobs without discrimination. Based on the background described, this research focuses on “Implementation of work quotas for persons with disabilities”.

KAJIAN ONTOLOGI, EPISTIMOLOGI, DAN AKSIOLOGI DALAM FILSAFAT HUKUM

Abdul Halim, Halimatul Maryani, Ridho Zikrillah — Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0700

The philosophy of law is part of general philosophy, as it offers philosophical reflection on the foundation of law itself. The object of legal philosophy is in the law itself. The law is closely related to the norms that govern human behavior. The philosophy of law is the first step to the end of the excavation of the pearl of law, menelistic to the bottom of the problem causing how one action and event will be governed by law. As a substance in the concept of legal philosophy it is very closely related to Ontology, Epistimology, and Axiology. In this study, the analysis of exposure is to use normative studies using qualitative analysis.

URGENSI PUTUSAN BAWASLU DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PROSES PEMILIHAN UMUM

Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra — Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0700

This research aims to review and analyze Bawaslu's position in resolving disputes arising in the election process. In addition, this study is also haunted to find out the urgency of the Bawaslu verdict in resolving disputes over the election process. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach. The data source obtained comes from secondary data using qualitative analysis. The first research result is the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) domiciled as an auxiliary state organ that has the main function of supervision of the holding of elections. Bawaslu in carrying out the judicial quasi process to resolve the election dispute. The object of Bawaslu's authority consists of the decision of the KPU where the decision in question is in the form of a Decree and or Event News.